A perception survey on the root causes of the high incidence of graft and corruption in the Philippines was conducted using a quota
sampling technique. The respondents were
categorized into 6 sectors, namely: business,
labor, academe, government, legal profession, and marginalized groups.
Table 1 describes the breakdown of the respondents who participated in the
perception survey.
Sector
|
Description
|
Respondent
|
%
|
Business
|
Business owners
|
78
|
14.9%
|
Labor
|
Employees in private firms
|
123
|
23.4%
|
Academe
|
Educators and students
|
127
|
24.2%
|
Government
|
Employees in government
agencies
|
64
|
12.2%
|
Legal Profession
|
Lawyers
|
55
|
10.5%
|
Marginalized
|
Informal settlers, persons
with disabilities, senior citizens, indigenous people
|
78
|
14.9%
|
Total
|
525
|
100%
|
Table 2: Sectoral
Breakdown of Perception Survey Respondents
Olken
(2007) asserts that perception surveys are a good measurement of knowing and
confirming objectively the extent of corruption.
The statements in Table 2 were used to determine the root causes of the
high incidence of graft and corruption in the Philippines:
Statements
|
Weight
|
Interpretation
|
Electing
the wrong public officials (Senate, House of Representatives, LGU) will
stimulate corruption within government agencies and units
|
5.438
|
High
|
Electing
the wrong president is the start of a potentially corrupt administration
|
5.371
|
High
|
The
role of families and households is critical in the development of a culture
of corruption in society
|
5.248
|
High
|
The
business sector and other sectors of society oftentimes create opportunities
for officials to commit corruption
|
5.055
|
High
|
The
educational system of the country contributes to the culture of corruption
|
4.592
|
High
|
Corruption in the Philippines is hopeless
|
3.684
|
Moderate
|
Table 2: Premise
statements to determine the root causes of graft and corruption in the Philippines
There are many root causes of graft
and corruption in the government. But the
most critical is that electing the wrong President will be the start of a
corrupt administration.
This confirms that the country’s unitary presidential
form of government coupled with a free and open party system created weak
political parties, weak judicial structures and weak legislature, thus
contributing to the emerging phenomenon of an imperial presidency which president
tends to overwhelm the other two co-equal branches, the legislature and the
judiciary. Thus there is a need to
review our country’s system of government and considering changing the
country’s free and open party system.
Since the country is
suffering from a democratic deficit, there is also a need to create stronger political
parties to close such deficit, making Philippine democracy more responsive to
the citizenry as a whole and address the interests and demands of those at the
bottom of society.
However, corruption is
not an exclusive domain of the government.
It permeates the most basic social unit of society, the family.
Moreover, these values
are further aggravated by the worsening poverty level, lack of opportunities
within the country, technological innovations, exploitation by media and
commercialization of culture and education.
Currently, a research was conducted where one in every ten families give
money, gifts, or favor to facilitate availing of a service from a government
service. Vote buying is already prevalent in every
election especially during the campaign period, or on the election day itself
when the voters are about to enter the polling booth.
Mass
media has become the most powerful tool used by the politicians to manipulate
the voting public. It shapes and molds opinions and attitudes and defines what
is normal and acceptable. What is disturbing is that the mass media’s influence
in delivering information has always been political.
What is also critical is that the business sector creates opportunities for government officials to commit graft and corruption in order to gain favors for the business enterprises
Finally, the failure of the Philippine educational system to educate young Filipinos contributes to the high incidence of graft and corruption in the country. This lack of education results to the lack of sense of nationhood which eventually connects to the core values of love of country, honesty and integrity. Results of the qualitative interview emphasized that the country’s lack of sense of nationalism goes back to the foreign occupations by the Japanese and Americans; the effects of the war in our country led the Filipinos to forget these values. Thus, corruption also happens within the classroom and within the boundaries of the school. Teachers are considered major influencers to the youth. Hence, the power of the youth vote in any electoral process cannot be understated. That is why it is important that a law for an extensive voter education at the grassroots level (households, schools and communities) be enacted.
References:
Griffin, E. (2009). First Look at Communication Theory (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Hutchcroft, P. & Rocamora, J. (2003). “Strong Demands and Weak Institutions: The Origins and Evolution of the Democratic Deficit in the Philippines." Journal of East Asian Studies 3 (2003), pp. 259-292.
Sison, J (2013). “Vote Buying,” Philippine Star Global (Opinion).
What is also critical is that the business sector creates opportunities for government officials to commit graft and corruption in order to gain favors for the business enterprises
Finally, the failure of the Philippine educational system to educate young Filipinos contributes to the high incidence of graft and corruption in the country. This lack of education results to the lack of sense of nationhood which eventually connects to the core values of love of country, honesty and integrity. Results of the qualitative interview emphasized that the country’s lack of sense of nationalism goes back to the foreign occupations by the Japanese and Americans; the effects of the war in our country led the Filipinos to forget these values. Thus, corruption also happens within the classroom and within the boundaries of the school. Teachers are considered major influencers to the youth. Hence, the power of the youth vote in any electoral process cannot be understated. That is why it is important that a law for an extensive voter education at the grassroots level (households, schools and communities) be enacted.
References:
Griffin, E. (2009). First Look at Communication Theory (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Hutchcroft, P. & Rocamora, J. (2003). “Strong Demands and Weak Institutions: The Origins and Evolution of the Democratic Deficit in the Philippines." Journal of East Asian Studies 3 (2003), pp. 259-292.
Sison, J (2013). “Vote Buying,” Philippine Star Global (Opinion).
Jo
G
No comments:
Post a Comment